This PR introduces a `#[diagnostic::on_unknown_item]` attribute that
allows crate authors to customize the error messages emitted by
unresolved imports. The main usecase for this is using this attribute as
part of a proc macro that expects a certain external module structure to
exist or certain dependencies to be there.
For me personally the motivating use-case are several derives in diesel,
that expect to refer to a `tabe` module. That is done either
implicitly (via the name of the type with the derive) or explicitly by
the user. This attribute would allow us to improve the error message in
both cases:
* For the implicit case we could explicity call out our
assumptions (turning the name into lower case, adding an `s` in the end)
+ point to the explicit variant as alternative
* For the explicit variant we would add additional notes to tell the
user why this is happening and what they should look for to fix the
problem (be more explicit about certain diesel specific assumptions of
the module structure)
I assume that similar use-cases exist for other proc-macros as well,
therefore I decided to put in the work implementing this new attribute.
I would also assume that this is likely not useful for std-lib internal
usage.
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#154554 (emit error on `#[track_caller]` with `extern fn`)
- rust-lang/rust#154858 (Change api of formatting diagnostic attribute strings.)
- rust-lang/rust#154876 (attr parsing: make sure we pass the right target when errors could be emitted)
Scalable vector types in `core_arch` are cfg'd for aarch64 and for
rustdoc, which can successfully document these types given any `--target`
(`core_arch` CI uses `i686-unknown-linux-gnu`) - this shouldn't trigger
the "scalable vectors not supported on arch" error.
* utilize Kleene `?` two avoid having two macro matchers with almost
identical body
* inline `gate_legacy` since it only has one use and since it shouldn't
be used anywhere else anyway
* remove unnecessary explicit borrows of the visitor
* replace `if let Some(spans) = spans.get(…) { for span in …` with
`for &span in spans.get(…).into_iter().flatten()` to avoid rightward
drift and explicit dereferences
* rename `gate_all_legacy…` to `soft_gate_all_legacy…` since it's not a
"proper" gate that issues an error but merely one that emits a warning
specifically this emits an error when
- a custom target is used
- `RiscV32 if self.llvm_abiname == "ilp32e"` this abi is used for 32-bit
embedded targets, and clang/llvm document that the ABI may change in
the future.
Emit ForbiddenBound fatally if meeting complex bound
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/149695
---
Bounds in binders are denied, hir items won't contain and index them. But nested items in the bounds will still be lowered to hir. And their parents, i.e., the block in bounds is not in hir. So that ICE happens when error handling requires visiting hir parents.
~~This PR collects hirless def ids and skips them when iterating parents.~~
~~This PR checks such bounds used in higher ranked binders and emit error `ForbiddenBound` when parsing. And make sure no such bounds appear in hir.~~
This PR emits this error fatally if meeting complex bound.
Move `Spanned`.
It's defined in `rustc_span::source_map` which doesn't make any sense because it has nothing to do with source maps. This commit moves it to the crate root, a more sensible spot for something this basic.
r? @JonathanBrouwer
It's defined in `rustc_span::source_map` which doesn't make any sense
because it has nothing to do with source maps. This commit moves it to
the crate root, a more sensible spot for something this basic.
Emit an error when attempting to compile a `#[rustc_scalable_vector]`
type for a architecture that fundamentally doesn't support scalable
vectors. Ultimately this is just a diagnostic improvement for an internal
attribute as users should never be doing this.
Feature gate for defaulted associated type_consts with associated_type_defaults
*[View all comments](https://triagebot.infra.rust-lang.org/gh-comments/rust-lang/rust/pull/152385)*
This PR for issue rust-lang/rust#130288 extends a feature gate that was already present for defaulted associated types to defaulted type consts under associated_type_defaults.
Code added:
```
if ctxt == AssocCtxt::Trait && rhs.is_some() {
gate!(
&self,
associated_type_defaults,
i.span,
"associated type defaults are unstable"
);
}
```
Error produced:
```
error[E0658]: associated type defaults are unstable
--> $DIR/type-const-associated-default.rs:4:5
|
LL | type const N: usize = 10;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #29661 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29661> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]` to the crate attributes to enable
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
warning: the feature `min_generic_const_args` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/type-const-associated-default.rs:1:12
|
LL | #![feature(min_generic_const_args)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #132980 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132980> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: aborting due to 1 previous error; 1 warning emitted
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
```
Thanks to @BoxyUwU for the guidance on this issue.
Implement RFC 3678: Final trait methods
Tracking: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131179
This PR is based on rust-lang/rust#130802, with some minor changes and conflict resolution.
Futhermore, this PR excludes final methods from the vtable of a dyn Trait.
And some excerpt from the original PR description:
> Implements the surface part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3678.
>
> I'm using the word "method" in the title, but in the diagnostics and the feature gate I used "associated function", since that's more accurate.
cc @joshtriplett
Revert, but without type const.
Update symbol for feature err, then update suggestion output, and lastly update tests that change because of those.
Update these new tests with the correct syntax, and few existing tests with the new outputs the merge with main added.
Fix for tidyfmt and some errors when manually resolving a merge conflicts.
Update these tests to use update error messages and type const syntax.
Update comments and error message to use new syntax instead of old type_const attribute.
Remove the type_const attribute
update some more tests to use the new syntax.
Update these test cases.
update feature gate test
Change gate logic for `mgca_type_const_syntax` to work also if `min_generic_const_args` is enabled.
Create a new feature gate that checks for the feature before expansion.
Make rustfmt handle the `type const` syntax correctly.
Add a convience method to check if a RhsKind is type const.
Rename `Const` discriminant to `Body` for `ConstItemRhsKind`
Give the `TraitItemKind` flag an enum instead of a simple bool to better describe what the flag is for.
Update formatting for these match statements.
Update clippy test to use type const syntax.
Update test to use type const syntax.
update rustfmt to match ast items.
Update clippy to match ast and hir items.
Few more test cases that used old attribute, instead of 'type const'
Update to match the output from the feature gate checks.
tidyfmt adjustments.
Update the is_type_const, so I can constrain record!(..) in encoder.rs
Update conditional compilation test.
Move the feature gate to after expansion to allow for cfg(...) to work.
Update some more tests to use the new syntax.
Update type const tests in associated-const-bindings to use new syntax.
Don't check based off the attribute, but the item here.
Update some tests outside of the const_generics folder that were using #[type_const]
update the tests in associated consts that use #[type_const] to use type const
Update these mgca tests with the type const syntax.
Add a flag to TraitItemKind for detecting type const for now. Maybe later change ItemConstRhs to have optional consts but that touches a lot more lines of code.
Don't need into for these now that it's a query.
Add is_type_const query to handle foreign def ids.
update this test to use type const syntax.
Fix logic here, we only want to lower if there is expression in this case.
Update built-in macros to use ConstItemRhsKind
Update more instance of the old ConstItemRhs.
Rename ConstItemKind to ConstItemRhsKind, I noticed there is a typed called ConstantItemKind, so add the Rhs to the name to avoid confusion.
Update lower to use ConstItemKind
Add an other helper method to check if the rhs kinda has an expr.
Update item parse to use ConstItemKind enum.
Felt the field name could a be little clear when editing a few other things.
Change the ConstItem struct see know if we have a type const or regular const.
Make sure this syntax is properly feature gated.
Implement MVP for opaque generic const arguments
This is meant to be the interim successor to generic const expressions.
Essentially, const item RHS's will be allowed to do arbitrary const
operations using generics. The limitation is that these const items will
be treated opaquely, like ADTs in nominal typing, such that uses of them
will only be equal if the same const item is referenced. In other words,
two const items with the exact same RHS will not be considered equal.
I also added some logic to check feature gates that depend on others
being enabled (like oGCA depending on mGCA).
### Coherence
During coherence, OGCA consts should be normalized ambiguously because
they are opaque but eventually resolved to a real value. We don't want
two OGCAs that have the same value to be treated as distinct for
coherence purposes. (Just like opaque types.)
This actually doesn't work yet because there are pre-existing
fundamental issues with equate relations involving consts that need to
be normalized. The problem is that we normalize only one layer of the
const item and don't actually process the resulting anon const. Normally
the created inference variable should be handled, which in this case
would cause us to hit the anon const, but that's not happening.
Specifically, `visit_const` on `Generalizer` should be updated to be
similar to `visit_ty`.
r? @BoxyUwU
This is meant to be the interim successor to generic const expressions.
Essentially, const item RHS's will be allowed to do arbitrary const
operations using generics. The limitation is that these const items will
be treated opaquely, like ADTs in nominal typing, such that uses of them
will only be equal if the same const item is referenced. In other words,
two const items with the exact same RHS will not be considered equal.
I also added some logic to check feature gates that depend on others
being enabled (like oGCA depending on mGCA).
= Coherence =
During coherence, OGCA consts should be normalized ambiguously because
they are opaque but eventually resolved to a real value. We don't want
two OGCAs that have the same value to be treated as distinct for
coherence purposes. (Just like opaque types.)
This actually doesn't work yet because there are pre-existing
fundamental issues with equate relations involving consts that need to
be normalized. The problem is that we normalize only one layer of the
const item and don't actually process the resulting anon const. Normally
the created inference variable should be handled, which in this case
would cause us to hit the anon const, but that's not happening.
Specifically, `visit_const` on `Generalizer` should be updated to be
similar to `visit_ty`.
abi: add a rust-preserve-none calling convention
This is the conceptual opposite of the rust-cold calling convention and is particularly useful in combination with the new `explicit_tail_calls` feature.
For relatively tight loops implemented with tail calling (`become`) each of the function with the regular calling convention is still responsible for restoring the initial value of the preserved registers. So it is not unusual to end up with a situation where each step in the tail call loop is spilling and reloading registers, along the lines of:
foo:
push r12
; do things
pop r12
jmp next_step
This adds up quickly, especially when most of the clobberable registers are already used to pass arguments or other uses.
I was thinking of making the name of this ABI a little less LLVM-derived and more like a conceptual inverse of `rust-cold`, but could not come with a great name (`rust-cold` is itself not a great name: cold in what context? from which perspective? is it supposed to mean that the function is rarely called?)
This is the conceptual opposite of the rust-cold calling convention and
is particularly useful in combination with the new `explicit_tail_calls`
feature.
For relatively tight loops implemented with tail calling (`become`) each
of the function with the regular calling convention is still responsible
for restoring the initial value of the preserved registers. So it is not
unusual to end up with a situation where each step in the tail call loop
is spilling and reloading registers, along the lines of:
foo:
push r12
; do things
pop r12
jmp next_step
This adds up quickly, especially when most of the clobberable registers
are already used to pass arguments or other uses.
I was thinking of making the name of this ABI a little less LLVM-derived
and more like a conceptual inverse of `rust-cold`, but could not come
with a great name (`rust-cold` is itself not a great name: cold in what
context? from which perspective? is it supposed to mean that the
function is rarely called?)
Oli Scherer