Merge pull request #2350 from theotherphil/fold_any

Lint for using hand-writing a fold with the same behaviour as any
This commit is contained in:
Oliver Schneider
2018-01-19 13:31:00 +01:00
committed by GitHub
5 changed files with 213 additions and 18 deletions
+36
View File
@@ -385,6 +385,42 @@ fn iter_skip_next() {
let _ = foo.filter().skip(42).next();
}
/// Calls which should trigger the `UNNECESSARY_FOLD` lint
fn unnecessary_fold() {
// Can be replaced by .any
let _ = (0..3).fold(false, |acc, x| acc || x > 2);
// Can be replaced by .all
let _ = (0..3).fold(true, |acc, x| acc && x > 2);
// Can be replaced by .sum
let _ = (0..3).fold(0, |acc, x| acc + x);
// Can be replaced by .product
let _ = (0..3).fold(1, |acc, x| acc * x);
}
/// Should trigger the `UNNECESSARY_FOLD` lint, with an error span including exactly `.fold(...)`
fn unnecessary_fold_span_for_multi_element_chain() {
let _ = (0..3).map(|x| 2 * x).fold(false, |acc, x| acc || x > 2);
}
/// Calls which should not trigger the `UNNECESSARY_FOLD` lint
fn unnecessary_fold_should_ignore() {
let _ = (0..3).fold(true, |acc, x| acc || x > 2);
let _ = (0..3).fold(false, |acc, x| acc && x > 2);
let _ = (0..3).fold(1, |acc, x| acc + x);
let _ = (0..3).fold(0, |acc, x| acc * x);
let _ = (0..3).fold(0, |acc, x| 1 + acc + x);
// We only match against an accumulator on the left
// hand side. We could lint for .sum and .product when
// it's on the right, but don't for now (and this wouldn't
// be valid if we extended the lint to cover arbitrary numeric
// types).
let _ = (0..3).fold(false, |acc, x| x > 2 || acc);
let _ = (0..3).fold(true, |acc, x| x > 2 && acc);
let _ = (0..3).fold(0, |acc, x| x + acc);
let _ = (0..3).fold(1, |acc, x| x * acc);
}
#[allow(similar_names)]
fn main() {
let opt = Some(0);
+36 -4
View File
@@ -493,13 +493,45 @@ error: called `skip(x).next()` on an iterator. This is more succinctly expressed
382 | let _ = &some_vec[..].iter().skip(3).next();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: used unwrap() on an Option value. If you don't want to handle the None case gracefully, consider using expect() to provide a better panic message
--> $DIR/methods.rs:391:13
error: this `.fold` can be written more succinctly using another method
--> $DIR/methods.rs:391:19
|
391 | let _ = opt.unwrap();
391 | let _ = (0..3).fold(false, |acc, x| acc || x > 2);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `.any(|x| x > 2)`
|
= note: `-D unnecessary-fold` implied by `-D warnings`
error: this `.fold` can be written more succinctly using another method
--> $DIR/methods.rs:393:19
|
393 | let _ = (0..3).fold(true, |acc, x| acc && x > 2);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `.all(|x| x > 2)`
error: this `.fold` can be written more succinctly using another method
--> $DIR/methods.rs:395:19
|
395 | let _ = (0..3).fold(0, |acc, x| acc + x);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `.sum()`
error: this `.fold` can be written more succinctly using another method
--> $DIR/methods.rs:397:19
|
397 | let _ = (0..3).fold(1, |acc, x| acc * x);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `.product()`
error: this `.fold` can be written more succinctly using another method
--> $DIR/methods.rs:402:34
|
402 | let _ = (0..3).map(|x| 2 * x).fold(false, |acc, x| acc || x > 2);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `.any(|x| x > 2)`
error: used unwrap() on an Option value. If you don't want to handle the None case gracefully, consider using expect() to provide a better panic message
--> $DIR/methods.rs:427:13
|
427 | let _ = opt.unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D option-unwrap-used` implied by `-D warnings`
error: aborting due to 66 previous errors
error: aborting due to 71 previous errors